Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1422778

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Amniotic fluid DNA samples were genotyped by multilocus-nested-PCR-RFLP, but only three of 11 markers amplified 113 of 122 (92.6%) samples, resulting in 12 untyped and 101 partial non-archetypal genotypes. The 101 typed samples were subdivided into four groups: G1 with 73 samples (5'and 3' SAG2 allele I + SAG3 allele III + GRA6 allele III), 53 had parasite load ≤ 102 parasites/mL (43 asymptomatic, 10 mild infections), 17 had load > 102 and ≤ 103 (one mild, 13 moderate and three severe), and three had load > 103 parasites/mL (three severe); G2 with 22 samples (5'and 3' SAG2 allele I + SAG3 allele III), all parasite load levels ≤ 102 parasites/mL (18 asymptomatic and four mild); G3 with five samples (5' and 3' SAG2 allele I + SAG3 allele II), parasite load ≤ 102 parasites/mL (three asymptomatic and two mild); G4 with one sample (5' and 3' SAG2 allele II + SAG3 allele II + GRA6 allele I), a parasite load < 102 parasites/mL in an asymptomatic infant. After DNA sequencing, restriction sites confirmed SAG2, SAG3 and GRA6 alleles in 98.7%, 100% and 100% of the cases, respectively, while single nucleotide polymorphisms confirmed 90% of 5'-SAG2 allele I; 98.7% of 3'-SAG2 allele I; 98% of SAG-3 allele III, but only 40% of GRA6 allele III results. For the moment, partial non-archetypal genotypes of parasites did not show any relationship with either parasite load in amniotic fluid samples or clinical outcome of infants at the age of 12 months.

2.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1387338

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT This study assessed the technical performance of a rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and compared LFIA results with chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) results and an in-house enzyme immunoassay (EIA). To this end, a total of 216 whole blood or serum samples from three groups were analyzed: the first group was composed of 68 true negative cases corresponding to blood bank donors, healthy young volunteers, and eight pediatric patients diagnosed with other coronavirus infections. The serum samples from these participants were obtained and stored in a pre-COVID-19 period, thus they were not expected to have COVID-19. In the second group of true positive cases, we chose to replace natural cases of COVID-19 by 96 participants who were expected to have produced anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies 30-60 days after the vaccine booster dose. The serum samples were collected on the same day that LFIA were tested either by EIA or CLIA. The third study group was composed of 52 participants (12 adults and 40 children) who did or did not have anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies due to specific clinical scenarios. The 12 adults had been vaccinated more than seven months before LFIA testing, and the 40 children had non-severe COVID-19 diagnosed using RT-PCR during the acute phase of infection. They were referred for outpatient follow-up and during this period the serum samples were collected and tested by CLIA and LFIA. All tests were performed by the same healthcare operator and there was no variation of LFIA results when tests were performed on finger prick whole blood or serum samples, so that results were grouped for analysis. LFIA's sensitivity in detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was 90%, specificity 97.6%, efficiency 93%, PPV 98.3%, NPV 86.6%, and likelihood ratio for a positive or a negative result were 37.5 and 0.01 respectively. There was a good agreement (Kappa index of 0.677) between LFIA results and serological (EIA or CLIA) results. In conclusion, LFIA analyzed in this study showed a good technical performance and agreement with reference serological assays (EIA or CLIA), therefore it can be recommended for use in the outpatient follow-up of non-severe cases of COVID-19 and to assess anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody production induced by vaccination and the antibodies decrease over time. However, LFIAs should be confirmed by using reference serological assays whenever possible.

3.
Marques, Heloisa Helena de Sousa; Pereira, Maria Fernanda Badue; Santos, Angélica Carreira dos; Fink, Thais Toledo; Paula, Camila Sanson Yoshino de; Litvinov, Nadia; Schvartsman, Claudio; Delgado, Artur Figueiredo; Gibelli, Maria Augusta Bento Cicaroni; Carvalho, Werther Brunow de; Odone Filho, Vicente; Tannuri, Uenis; Carneiro-Sampaio, Magda; Grisi, Sandra; Duarte, Alberto José da Silva; Antonangelo, Leila; Francisco, Rossana Pucineli Vieira; Okay, Thelma Suely; Batisttella, Linamara Rizzo; Carvalho, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de; Brentani, Alexandra Valéria Maria; Silva, Clovis Artur; Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik; Rossi Junior, Alfio; Fante, Alice Lima; Cora, Aline Pivetta; Reis, Amelia Gorete A. de Costa; Ferrer, Ana Paula Scoleze; Andrade, Anarella Penha Meirelles de; Watanabe, Andreia; Gonçalves, Angelina Maria Freire; Waetge, Aurora Rosaria Pagliara; Silva, Camila Altenfelder; Ceneviva, Carina; Lazari, Carolina dos Santos; Abellan, Deipara Monteiro; Santos, Emilly Henrique dos; Sabino, Ester Cerdeira; Bianchini, Fabíola Roberta Marim; Alcantara, Flávio Ferraz de Paes; Ramos, Gabriel Frizzo; Leal, Gabriela Nunes; Rodriguez, Isadora Souza; Pinho, João Renato Rebello; Carneiro, Jorge David Avaizoglou; Paz, Jose Albino; Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho; Ferranti, Juliana Ferreira; Ferreira, Juliana de Oliveira Achili; Framil, Juliana Valéria de Souza; Silva, Katia Regina da; Kanunfre, Kelly Aparecida; Bastos, Karina Lucio de Medeiros; Galleti, Karine Vusberg; Cristofani, Lilian Maria; Suzuki, Lisa; Campos, Lucia Maria Arruda; Perondi, Maria Beatriz de Moliterno; Diniz, Maria de Fatima Rodrigues; Fonseca, Maria Fernanda Mota; Cordon, Mariana Nutti de Almeida; Pissolato, Mariana; Peres, Marina Silva; Garanito, Marlene Pereira; Imamura, Marta; Dorna, Mayra de Barros; Luglio, Michele; Rocha, Mussya Cisotto; Aikawa, Nadia Emi; Degaspare, Natalia Viu; Sakita, Neusa Keico; Udsen, Nicole Lee; Scudeller, Paula Gobi; Gaiolla, Paula Vieira de Vincenzi; Severini, Rafael da Silva Giannasi; Rodrigues, Regina Maria; Toma, Ricardo Katsuya; Paula, Ricardo Iunis Citrangulo de; Palmeira, Patricia; Forsait, Silvana; Farhat, Sylvia Costa Lima; Sakano, Tânia Miyuki Shimoda; Koch, Vera Hermina Kalika; Cobello Junior, Vilson; HC-FMUSP Pediatric COVID Study Group.
Clinics ; 76: e3488, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1350619

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare demographic/clinical/laboratory/treatments and outcomes among children and adolescents with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that included patients diagnosed with pediatric COVID-19 (aged <18 years) between April 11, 2020 and April 22, 2021. During this period, 102/5,951 (1.7%) of all admissions occurred in neonates, children, and adolescents. Furthermore, 3,962 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection samples were processed in patients aged <18 years, and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 155 (4%) inpatients and outpatients. Six/155 pediatric patients were excluded from the study. Therefore, the final group included 149 children and adolescents (n=97 inpatients and 52 outpatients) with positive SARS-CoV-2 results. RESULTS: The frequencies of sore throat, anosmia, dysgeusia, headache, myalgia, nausea, lymphopenia, pre-existing chronic conditions, immunosuppressive conditions, and autoimmune diseases were significantly reduced in children and adolescents (p<0.05). Likewise, the frequencies of enoxaparin use (p=0.037), current immunosuppressant use (p=0.008), vasoactive agents (p=0.045), arterial hypotension (p<0.001), and shock (p=0.024) were significantly lower in children than in adolescents. Logistic regression analysis showed that adolescents with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 had increased odds ratios (ORs) for sore throat (OR 13.054; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.750-61.977; p=0.001), nausea (OR 8.875; 95% CI 1.660-47.446; p=0.011), and lymphopenia (OR 3.575; 95% CI 1.355-9.430; p=0.010), but also had less hospitalizations (OR 0.355; 95% CI 0.138-0.916; p=0.032). The additional logistic regression analysis on patients with preexisting chronic conditions (n=108) showed that death as an outcome was significantly associated with pediatric severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (OR 22.300; 95% CI 2.341-212.421; p=0.007) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) (OR 11.261; 95% CI 1.189-106. 581; p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases occurred in adolescents. Individuals belonging to this age group had an acute systemic involvement of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pediatric SARS and MIS-C were the most important factors associated with the mortality rate in pediatric chronic conditions with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Child , Adolescent , COVID-19/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cohort Studies , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Tertiary Care Centers , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Clinics ; 75: e2209, 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1133484

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes of pediatric patients with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with or without multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 471 samples collected from 371 patients (age<18 years) suspected of having severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The study group comprised 66/371 (18%) laboratory-confirmed pediatric COVID-19 patients: 61 (92.5%) patients tested positive on real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for SARS-CoV-2, and 5 (7.5%) patients tested positive on serological tests. MIS-C was diagnosed according to the criteria of the Center for Disease Control. RESULTS: MIS-C was diagnosed in 6/66 (9%) patients. The frequencies of diarrhea, vomiting, and/or abdominal pain (67% vs. 22%, p=0.034); pediatric SARS (67% vs. 13%, p=0.008); hypoxemia (83% vs. 23%, p=0.006); and arterial hypotension (50% vs. 3%, p=0.004) were significantly higher in patients with MIS-C than in those without MIS-C. The frequencies of C-reactive protein levels >50 mg/L (83% vs. 25%, p=0.008) and D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL (100% vs. 40%, p=0.007) and the median D-dimer, troponin T, and ferritin levels (p<0.05) were significantly higher in patients with MIS-C. The frequencies of pediatric intensive care unit admission (100% vs. 60%, p=0.003), mechanical ventilation (83% vs. 7%, p<0.001), vasoactive agent use (83% vs. 3%, p<0.001), shock (83% vs. 5%, p<0.001), cardiac abnormalities (100% vs. 2%, p<0.001), and death (67% vs. 3%, p<0.001) were also significantly higher in patients with MIS-C. Similarly, the frequencies of oxygen therapy (100% vs. 33%, p=0.003), intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (67% vs. 2%, p<0.001), aspirin therapy (50% vs. 0%, p<0.001), and current acute renal replacement therapy (50% vs. 2%, p=0.002) were also significantly higher in patients with MIS-C. Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of MIS-C was significantly associated with gastrointestinal manifestations [odds ratio (OR)=10.98; 95%CI (95% confidence interval)=1.20-100.86; p=0.034] and hypoxemia [OR=16.85; 95%CI=1.34-211.80; p=0.029]. Further univariate analysis showed a positive association between MIS-C and death [OR=58.00; 95%CI=6.39-526.79; p<0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 with MIS-C had a severe clinical spectrum with a high mortality rate. Our study emphasizes the importance of investigating MIS-C in pediatric patients with COVID-19 presenting with gastrointestinal involvement and hypoxemia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus , Pandemics , Respiration, Artificial , Vomiting/etiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/epidemiology , Diarrhea/etiology , Fever/etiology , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/therapy , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/epidemiology , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/virology
5.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 46(5): 584-588, Sept-Oct/2013.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-691427

ABSTRACT

Introduction Toxoplasmosis may be life-threatening in fetuses and in immune-deficient patients. Conventional laboratory diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is based on the presence of IgM and IgG anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies; however, molecular techniques have emerged as alternative tools due to their increased sensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 4 PCR-based methods for the laboratory diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. One hundred pregnant women who seroconverted during pregnancy were included in the study. The definition of cases was based on a 12-month follow-up of the infants. Methods Amniotic fluid samples were submitted to DNA extraction and amplification by the following 4 Toxoplasma techniques performed with parasite B1 gene primers: conventional PCR, nested-PCR, multiplex-nested-PCR, and real-time PCR. Seven parameters were analyzed, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and efficiency (Ef). Results Fifty-nine of the 100 infants had toxoplasmosis; 42 (71.2%) had IgM antibodies at birth but were asymptomatic, and the remaining 17 cases had non-detectable IgM antibodies but high IgG antibody titers that were associated with retinochoroiditis in 8 (13.5%) cases, abnormal cranial ultrasound in 5 (8.5%) cases, and signs/symptoms suggestive of infection in 4 (6.8%) cases. The conventional PCR assay detected 50 cases (9 false-negatives), nested-PCR detected 58 cases (1 false-negative and 4 false-positives), multiplex-nested-PCR detected 57 cases (2 false-negatives), and real-time-PCR detected 58 cases (1 false-negative). Conclusions The real-time PCR assay was the best-performing technique based on the parameters of Se (98.3%), Sp (100%), PPV (100%), NPV (97.6%), PLR (∞), NLR (0.017), and Ef (99%). .


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Amniotic Fluid/parasitology , Toxoplasma , Toxoplasmosis, Congenital/diagnosis , Amniotic Fluid/chemistry , Antibodies, Protozoan/analysis , DNA Primers , DNA, Protozoan/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Toxoplasma/genetics , Toxoplasma/immunology
6.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 13(1): 53-58, Feb. 2009. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-517815

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the performance of the ELISA technique in the detection of IgA antibodies against different Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigenic preparations in serum samples from 49 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis collected before and after the start of specific treatment. The controls consisted of serum samples from healthy patients without any prior contact with the bacteria and serum samples from patients with other pneumopathies. Glycolipid antigen gave the best diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 88 percent and specificities varying from 88 to 100 percent in the control groups. These antigens constitute a powerful tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antigens, Bacterial , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/immunology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Glycolipids , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/immunology , Young Adult
7.
São Paulo; s.n; 2007. 125 p. ilus, tab, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-464478

ABSTRACT

No presente estudo verificamos o desempenho do Western blotting e do QuantiFERON® – TB Gold para o diagnóstico da tuberculose pulmonar e a detecção de moléculas de adesão celular como marcadores de prognóstico. Os resultados mostraram que o Western blotting apresentou sensibilidade de 94 por cento e especificidade de 96 por cento, os requisitos da OMS para testes sorológicos. O QuantiFERON® – TB Gold apresentou sensibilidade de 83 por cento e especificidade de 100 por cento, após ajuste do limiar de reatividade. A diminuição significativa das concentrações de ICAM 1 e selectinas presentes nos soros de pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar no início e após o término do tratamento, sugere um bom prognóstico para os pacientes.


In this study we verified the performance of Western blotting and QuantiFERON® - TB Gold for diagnosis pulmonary tuberculosis and circulating adhesion molecules as prognosis markers. Western blotting results showed a high performance with sensitivity of 94 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent, attending WHO requirements for serological tests. After adjusting the threshold, QuantiFERON® - TB Gold showed sensitivity of 83 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent. The levels of ICAM-1 and selectins after treatment were significantly lower in pulmonary tuberculosis patients when compared to the levels before treatment suggest a better prognosis for patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blotting, Western , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Cell Adhesion Molecules , Interferons
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL